Reference for Paper

Lee, M. C. Y., Chow, J. Y., Komar, J., Tan, C. W. K., & Button, C. (2014). Nonlinear pedagogy: an effective approach to cater for individual differences in learning a sports skill. PloS one9(8), e104744.

🚀 Article in 3 Sentences

  1. The researchers set out to examine the difference between a Linear Pedagogy and a Non-Linear Pedagogy in learning the forehand groundstroke. “It was predicted that while the NP group would perform better in accuracy scores, it would produce lower movement criterion scores and display a greater variety of movement patterns to achieve the task goal, as compared to the LP group, indicating the presence of degeneracy”
  2. After the pre-test, the 24 participants took part in a 4 week intervention. 1 group followed a LP intervention and the other followed a NLP. They took part in a post test analysis and a retention test which took place 4 weeks after post test. The results of retention test are very interesting.
  3. Despite not typically performing the Forehand in an ‘ideal’ way the participants still improved their accuracy scores just as much. There was signs of ‘degeneracy’ in the NLP group. “Degeneracy plays a functional role in helping performers to adapt to ever-changing task demands during practice and performance “

🤝Impressions

This was a very nice research article. Even though some parts were written in a very academic way there was still lots of takeaways for coaches. Looking at the design of the interventions would give coaches a good contrast between what is involved in a ‘Linear’ approach and what is involved in a ‘Non-Linear’ approach.

🎾How Article will influence my coaching

🖐 Who should read it?

This is a great paper to read for anyone interested in Skill Acquisition. It highlights the different effects that the two approaches have on the ‘acquisition’ of a particular skill over a short time frame.